My question in regards to Cate Blanchett's performance in the film Tár, and perhaps more generally about the film overall is, why? Don't get me wrong, a film that leaves me with a question isn't in and of itself a bad thing, but it's not automatically a good thing either. There is no arguing that Cate Blanchett virtually transforms herself for this character, not that her physical appearance is notably different from roles in other films, rather it is that she is so convincing as the conductor Lydia Tár, that we forget any of those previous characters, and at times actually forget that it's Cate Blanchett. But why does it matter? Perhaps there is an important message here about giving too much leeway to people who excel in their respective fields; the better you are, the more you can get away with. We've seen this in films about politicians, movie producers, and athletes, so perhaps it was time for an exposé on classical music conductors. But considering that Lydia Tár is a fictional character, and it doesn't seem like the classical music community is necessarily a ripe breeding ground for narcissistic predators, why did the filmmakers feel compelled to tell this story? Admittedly, it is an interesting juxtaposition to see a strong female character depicted as egocentric, domineering, maniacal, and heartless. Traditionally, feminist films seek to portray women in a strong, but positive light. In the recent Promising Young Woman, with Carey Mulligan basically playing the Dark Knight, reigning down vengeance on frat boys, she was depicted as justified in her actions, so the positive portrayal of feminist values was perpetuated. I'm not saying that there aren't other feminist films where ideas of women behaving badly, and mistreating each are explored; The Favourite for example is about a truly despicable woman, and I can't remember any redeeming qualities or excuses being made. Actually, I believe that my recollection of that film actually causes the whole premise of my review of Tár to fall apart. Sometimes you don't need to answer the question of why - no, sometimes it's just enough to make an interesting film, and have a virtuoso performance by one of, if not the best actress of all time. Would it have been better if the film had served a deeper purpose? Sure, but it's too late now.
No comments:
Post a Comment