Friday, July 20, 2012

The Dark Knight Rises


I can describe my impression of "The Dark Knight Rises" with one word; messy.
The film opens eight years after the events detailed in "The Dark Knight" which have driven Batman into hiding and simultaneously brought peace to Gotham by portraying Harvey Dent as a martyr. Naturally a new threat has arisen, and Batman must once again don his cape et al and fight, even if he has lost his public approval ratings. Director Christopher Nolan wisely follows this logical path, and the story arc itself is well crafted. The Batman character (or Bruce Wayne, more interchangeable here than before) is presented with a suitable adversary, one who challenges him to his physical and mental limit.


Unfortunately there are too many unnecessary side-characters, and an over-reaching scale. What I mean by scale is that previously Gotham has been depicted as a self-contained city, perhaps meant to symbolize the moral decline which has accompanied urban expansion. Yet in "The Dark Knight Rises" there are cuts to a remote command center (out of Gotham) where Air Force analysts worry about the device which threatens Gotham. Jets are scrambled from offsite and fly over Gotham. Military approaches Gotham over a bridge, meeting citizen half-way. All this shatters the illusion which defines Gotham, and I found myself thinking more of "24" episodes than Batman. Nolan also made the misstep of introducing at least six or seven new supporting characters in this film when only three of them are in any way integral to the plot. The new police chief, members of Wayne Enterprise’s board, and Catwoman all waste valuable screen time.  The choreography of the mob fight sequences is also awkward, which may have been somewhat intentional to create a chaotic atmosphere, but I found it distracting.
In the midst of a messily assembled movie I found myself really enjoying the two most important elements;   Batman/Bruce Wayne’s journey and Bane’s (the antagonist) thread.  Starting with Bane, here is a character who is a man of action.  Backstory and motivation are not as important in understanding Bane, as is observing the path of destruction he leaves.  His physical prowess makes him an imposing figure, which Nolan conveys wonderfully through editing, dialogue and the primary fight sequence between Batman and Bane.  This fight scene was one of the two most important scenes of the movie.  This was the breaking of Batman, literally and metaphorically.  Bane’s breaking of Batman is intertwined with Bruce Wayne’s struggle throughout the film to understand what he should do, and who he should be.  The second most important scene is Wayne’s climb from the inescapable (?) pit prison.  Once again this ascent is meant to be taken at face value and for its symbolic parallels to Wayne’s internal struggle.  Christian Bale is the perfect actor to play Batman, because the audience can sincerely root for him as Gotham’s salvation and despise him for the wretch he is, both at the same time.  At the center of Nolan’s failed attempt to make an epic finale to his Batman trilogy, is a much humbler but truly powerful cautionary tale.


While there is so much more I could discuss, it’s best that I close by briefly commenting on the ending of “The Dark Knight Rises”.  So often I criticize great films for their unsatisfactory endings; with this film I find that observation turned on its head.  The last five minutes of this film almost made me forgive Nolan for the previous 2 ½ hours.  While the ending may not have been fitting for the movie itself, it was a stand-alone good ending, one which will bring smiles to faces of Batman fans everywhere.  I had a smile on my face as the credits started rolling.

Sunday, July 08, 2012

Moonrise Kingdom and Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter

My brother Nate has an interesting perspective on Wes Anderson movies, and the people who love them.  In a condensed form, Wes Anderson is a one trick pony who has snowed his fans into thinking that he is a genius.  Basically Wes Anderson makes the same movie over and over again, yet he is acclaimed as being 'truly original'...  Nate "I'm sorry if I completely mischaracterized your view (or omitted important elements) but please keep reading.  Up 'til now I would have argued passionately that this wasn't the case, I have always thoroughly enjoyed Wes Anderson movies.  I chalked up my dislike for "The Darjeeling Limited" to being a close call; it was funny but somehow just barely missed the mark.  Now with "Moonrise Kingdom" the veil has been completely lifted.  I should have stopped watching Wes Anderson four movies ago (making an exception for "The Fantastic Mr. Fox of course).  Of course if you've never seen a Wes Anderson movie before, and you're someone who would like a Wes Anderson movie, you'd probably love "Moonrise Kingdom".  The reason for this being that it's the same as any other Wes Anderson movie (maybe even more so).  I think what I've come to realize is that I've seen too many Wes Anderson movies.  Perhaps they're all perfectly decent films, unfortunately they don't work in the 'canon' form.  The question now arises; will I still be able to enjoy my favorite Wes Anderson movies now that I've come to  agree with Nate?

I know that the following conclusion seems inconsistent with so many other movies I've reviewed over the years, but I really liked "Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter".  The very title of this film asks the audience to suspend reality, and if you are able to do this for just about two hours, then you too could enjoy Abraham Lincoln hunting, killing, and trash-talking vampires.  In Tarantino's "Inglorious Basterds" we got the satisfaction of seeing American soldiers fill Hitler full of lead; it seems only natural that Abraham Lincoln, had any vampires been around, would have personally taken it upon himself to decapitate as many as possible.  Couple that factoid with the idea of vampires being Southerners, and moreover slave owning Southerners, and it becomes obvious that Lincoln would have gone berserk.  If I'm going to suspend reality when I enter a movie theater, I might as well follow it to it's over-the-top, yet logical conclusion.  As I write this the movie "The Road" comes to mind.  While that movie probably was meant to be a allegory of sorts, it was presented as a realistic depiction of the world's end.  Unfortunately too many holes appeared and the sceenplay fell short.  Ironically, "Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter" maintains its credibility without skipping a beat.

Tuesday, July 03, 2012

Brave

"Brave" is a decent movie.
Let me suggest that the greatest films Pixar  has produced would have been impossible to create without computer animation.  "Finding Nemo" and "Ratatouille" feature non-human characters that could not be convincing with live-action and would be far too limited using traditional animation.  That being said, I feel as though "Brave" was an unnecessary undertaking for Pixar.  While there is some magical shape-shifting which demonstrates the talent of Pixar's artists, this could easily have been as a special effect in a live-action film.  I would argue that computer animation shouldn't be used to replace human actors, rather as a supplement (to enhance human performances).  If the lead role in "Brave" had been played by a real little girl I would have felt a much stronger connection to what was happening in her life onscreen.  While quite a different film, "Hanna" also centered on a brave young girl; even in the most outrageous situations I found that film to be much more compelling than "Brave".  None of this is meant to detract from the qualities which definitely exist in Pixar's newest addition.  The animation is excellent, the scenery is lush, and "Brave" contains the richest musical score of any Pixar film to date.  I liked the characters, I especially enjoyed watching the girl's mother (in both forms) as her character went through an interesting transformation (on multiple levels). 
It seems to me that "Brave" was a pretty safe choice for Pixar; it has a traditional story and characters who are easy to relate to.  Personally I prefer the riskier Pixar undertakings; a rat who loves great food is exceedingly more interesting to me.